[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Alain Frisch <frisch@c...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] New polymorphic variant syntax |
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Patrick M Doane wrote: > Having abbreviations like 'inline' works really well. I'm curious to know > if there is a good way to represent the following information: > > <!ELEMENT FORM - - (%flow;)+ -(FORM)> > > This states that a FORM element can have any flow object except for FORM > (i.e. nesting is not allowed). > > How difficult would it be to extend the polymorphic variant syntax to list > tags that should not be included in the conjuction? Perhaps this already > possible? Of course we can always revert to simply listing the variants. The type [> `Form of t] where t is an abstract type, for instance should be ok for this, no ? -- Alain ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr