Jeff Henrikson wrote:
> Has anybody considered sidestepping the native/bytecode compatablity
> issue in favor of an all native toplevel?  That is, one which takes an
> expression, compiles it to native code, and loads it back in to code
> space?  For example, write it out to a shared lib, either one for each
> expression (or more likely for efficiency) one for some reasonably sized
> history of expressions.  Then dlopen and dlsym the symbols into place.
> 
It would be great to have a toplevel that compiles to native code. If this
would only be possible under UNIX I would immediately change from NT to
Linux (what I probably should do anyway). Native code compilation in the
toplevel was one of the reasons to consider to use Lisp.

Rolf Wester
-------------------------------------
Rolf Wester
rolf.wester@ilt.fraunhofer.de
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr