[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Xavier Leroy <xavier.leroy@i...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Systhreads under Win/NT |
> I have been trying to get a DLL running, as written in OCaml. I have been > quite successful, but along the way I had to modify the Thread.ML source to > become a delayed initialization. > Doing this allows DLL's to call caml_startup() without fear of blowing > out of the water. During DllMain() the code is only permitted restricted > capabilities, and starting up new threads is apparently not one of them. OK, I wasn't aware of this restriction. A simple workaround is to remove the creation of the "tick" thread (the one that generates context-switch events at regular intervals) from caml_startup(), and create it when the first user thread is created. There is no need to generate context-switches until at least two threads are running! I'll see what I can do about it. > -------------------------- > Finally, here is a question for the pro's who wrote the SysThreads C code... > > I understand from reading the M$ documentation that Thread Local Store is at > least 64 words long. But not guaranteed to be any larger than this. Since > your C code uses two global vars labeled as thread local, i.e., > > ----------------------------------------------------- > /* The descriptor for the currently executing thread (thread-specific) */ > > static __declspec( thread ) caml_thread_t curr_thread = NULL; > > [...other code elided...] > > /* The thread-specific variable holding last locked I/O channel */ > > static __declspec( thread ) struct channel * last_channel_locked = NULL; > > --------------------------------------------------- > ...doesn't this imply that there is a limit of 64 systhreads guaranteed in > the system? I understand this limitation as "at most 64 words of TLS *per thread*". Since we're using only 2, that should be OK, without limiting the number of threads created. > Second part of question, more of a comment, is that when DLL's are created, > manual loading via LoadLibrary() obviates the use of Thread Local storage, > as per M$ documentation. That means that one cannot use LoadLibrary() to > load a threaded OCaml DLL, as the thread storage mechanism relied upon by > the systhreads is not properly activated by the loading process. Correct. In the working sources, in order to support dynamic loading of the Systhread C code, I rewrote the __declspec(thread) variables into explicit calls to TlsGetValue and TlsSetValue, to work around this issue. - Xavier Leroy ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr