Browse thread
[Caml-list] limits on mutual recursion and modules?
-
William Harold Newman
-
Brian Rogoff
- William Harold Newman
-
Brian Rogoff
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | William Harold Newman <william.newman@a...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] limits on mutual recursion and modules? |
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 04:27:24AM +0000, Brian Rogoff wrote: > On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, William Harold Newman wrote: > > for mutual recursion between classes and modules in OCaml. That doesn't > > You mean between classes and types here, of course. Yes. > You use that same trick. It also means that you must make a polymorphic > version of Set to participate in the recursion; the library Set won't do. > Check this out > > http://caml.inria.fr/archives/200010/msg00154.html Thank you, that seems to be exactly what I was looking for. > It's my guess that every frequent user of OCaml or SML bangs into this > within their first 9 months of serious ML programming, and most likely > long before that. It might make a good entry in <http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/FAQ_EXPERT-eng.html>. -- William Harold Newman <william.newman@airmail.net> "Furious activity is no substitute for understanding." -- H. H. Williams PGP key fingerprint 85 CE 1C BA 79 8D 51 8C B9 25 FB EE E0 C3 E5 7C ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr