> My aim is code base reduction, and ease of generation, because I want to
> unload about 300 KLOC onto some unsuspecting maintenance programmer. I need
> to get out from under this code burden!!!! So the jury is still out on which
> way to go... Code base reduction is the same, ease of use is somewhat better
> in Lisp, but robustness is significantly better in OCaml... It also helps to
> have the source code!!
> 
> Cheers,

But, does the unsuspecting maintenance programmer know OCaml?

Cheers,
Julian.
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr