Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
RE: [Caml-list] License Conditions for OCaml
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Sven <luther@d...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] License Conditions for OCaml
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 08:12:06PM -0700, Richard Stallman wrote:
>     > It is easy enough to do that.  That is what we did in the GCC support
>     > library, libgcc, because it consists mainly of many very simple
>     > functions.
>     mmm, but then i suppose the libgcc is not licenced under the LGPL, is it ? 
> Correct--it has a different license.  They might want to take a look
> at that license.  Many variations on it can be made.

Is this licence acesible from somewhere apart the full gcc code ?

BTW, i suppose it is fully GPL/LGPL compatible and well recognized as free
software licence ?


Sven Luther
Bug reports:  FAQ:
To unsubscribe, mail  Archives: