On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 08:12:06PM -0700, Richard Stallman wrote:
>     > It is easy enough to do that.  That is what we did in the GCC support
>     > library, libgcc, because it consists mainly of many very simple
>     > functions.
> 
>     mmm, but then i suppose the libgcc is not licenced under the LGPL, is it ? 
> 
> Correct--it has a different license.  They might want to take a look
> at that license.  Many variations on it can be made.

Is this licence acesible from somewhere apart the full gcc code ?

BTW, i suppose it is fully GPL/LGPL compatible and well recognized as free
software licence ?

Friendly,

Sven Luther
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr