On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 08:24:05AM +0900, Jacques Garrigue wrote:
> 
> This clause is often known as "modified GPL", and allows in fact more
> than the LGPL.
> But it looks like we made a different choice for ocaml, applying a
> similar clause to the LGPL rather than the GPL. It avoids to have to
> prove to everybody that the "modified GPL" is liberal enough...
> Also, I wonder whether you can relicense under LGPL code released under
> "modified GPL"? The wording does not say so, but the constraints are
> similar.

One could imagine simply dual licencing it under both the LGPL and the
modified GPL.

Anyway, i guess now the choice is for xavier and the rest of the ocaml team to
make, ...

Friendly,

Sven Luther
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr