Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] mutability analysis too strict?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Mark Seaborn <mrs35@c...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] mutability analysis too strict?
"Ohad Rodeh" <ORODEH@il.ibm.com> writes:

> Well, that's a strong argument ...
> 
> How do you propose building a repository of polymorphic values then?
> 
>      Ohad.

I assume you don't want to store polymorphic values (eg. polymorphic
functions) but want to store values of different (but monomorphic)
types.  One way is to wrap your values up in a variant type.  However,
that limits you to a fixed, finite number of types which must be
declared in the same place.  Here's some code which effectively lets
you create an open (extensible) variant type:


module type Stamp = sig
  type t
  val make : unit -> t
  val eq : t -> t -> bool
end

(* This is vulnerable to overflow, and will not garbage collect
   unused stamps.  However, the one advantage of this is that new
   stamps require no heap allocation. *)
module Stamp_Int : Stamp = struct
  type t = int
  let c = ref 0
  let make() = let v = !c in c := v+1; v
  let eq s1 s2 = s1 = s2
end

module Stamp_Cell : Stamp = struct
  type t = unit ref
  let make() = ref()
  let eq s1 s2 = s1 == s2
  (* An interesting difference between SML and OCaml is that
     in OCaml, `=' will recursive into references, whereas in
     SML, `=' stops at references and compares their locations. *)
end

module Stamp = Stamp_Cell


(* Should obey these axioms:
     unpack b (pack b x) = Some x
     unpack b1 (pack b2 x) = None    provided b1 != b2
     unpack b null = None
   (ie. for the last one, the brand for null is closely-held)
   and lastly:
     make_brand() != make_brand()
   NB. The equality used here is behavioural equality (which
   is undecidable) rather than OCaml's `=' or `=='.
*)
module type Dyn = sig
  type 'a brand
  type t
  val make_brand : unit -> 'a brand
  val pack : 'a brand -> 'a -> t
  val unpack : 'a brand -> t -> 'a option
  val null : t
end

(* The aim is that this should be type sound.  The reason this should be
   sound is that it is not possible to create polymorphic brands,
   since the same restriction that applies to polymorphic references
   applies here, and brands, like references, are generative, so that
   eta-converting will change the semantics and not break
   soundness. *)
(* GC properties:
   If you discard a dyn value, its hidden value will be GC'd.
   But if you discard a brand, the hidden values in the dyn types won't. *)
module Dyn_Cast : Dyn = struct
  (* Don't care about this type; it is cast to and from,
     the equivalent of C's void*. *)
  type any = int
  type 'a brand = Stamp.t
  type t = Stamp.t * any
  let make_brand() = Stamp.make()
  let pack brand value = (brand, Obj.magic value)
  let unpack brand1 (brand2, value) =
    if Stamp.eq brand1 brand2 then Some (Obj.magic value) else None
  let null = pack (make_brand()) ()
end

(* Implementation using `energetic secrets'.  Does not require unsafe
   constructs like Obj.magic, but will not work as expected if
   temporal encapsulation is violated, eg. by concurrency.  OCaml
   doesn't have re-enterable continuations to violate this with,
   though if it did I'm not sure if you'd be able to capture a
   continuation inside the unpacking operation. *)
module Dyn_ES : Dyn = struct
  type 'a brand = 'a option ref
  (* Passing an action saves having to create two closures *)
  type action = Fill | Clear
  type t = action -> unit
  let make_brand() = ref None
  let pack brand value = function
    | Fill -> brand := Some value
    | Clear -> brand := None
  (* Invariant applies before these are called:  all brands are empty. *)
  let unpack brand f =
    f Fill;
    let r = !brand in
      f Clear; r
  (* This packed value modifies no brand when invoked *)
  let null _ = ()
end

module Dyn = Dyn_Cast

-- 
         Mark Seaborn
   - mseaborn@bigfoot.com - http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~mrs35/ -

        ``Cambridge?  Didn't that used to be a polytechnic?''
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr