[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2001-12-10 (08:06) |
From: | Francois Pottier <francois.pottier@i...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] type proofs |
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 01:28:18PM -0800, Charles Martin wrote: > I have the usual kind of type error: > > Values do not match: > val send : ('a, int, 'b) t -> 'a -> int > is not included in > val send : ('a, 'b, 'c) t -> 'a -> int Your implementation is well-typed, but less general than what's declared in your interface. The right thing to do is to add type annotations to your code to help pinpoint the error location. One would like to write: let send (x : ('a, 'b, 'c) t) (y : 'a) = ... Unfortunately, this will not help, because O'Caml interprets these type variables as existentially bound, i.e. it thinks it is OK to instantiate 'b with int. There is no way, as far as I know, to require them to be intepreted as universally bound. One work-around here is to write: let send (x : ('a, bool, 'c) t) (y : 'a) = ... Here, if your code were general enough, your implementation would still typecheck. However, because the inferred type mentions int and you have required bool, a type error will arise somewhere, and that should help you locate the error. (Here, I have used bool, but any concrete or abstract type other than int would do.) Of course, you'll need to remove the annotation when done. I hope this helps, -- François Pottier Francois.Pottier@inria.fr http://pauillac.inria.fr/~fpottier/ ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr