Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Stop at exception
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Nicolas George <>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Non-mutable strings
Le duodi 22 nivôse, an CCX, Brian Rogoff a écrit :
> Sure, that works, but I think if the Caml community really wants immutable
> strings (and it seems that quite a few people do) it might make sense to
> try some alternative implementations, like ropes. It was mentioned on
> this list that some older version of Caml used ropes; maybe they could be
> resurrected?

I second that. Something that would be really nice would be to have tail
recursive appends as efficient as with the Buffer module. And from the
syntactic viewpoint, a rule similar to the one that allow strings tokens
to be seen as format could be the solution to implement that.
Bug reports:  FAQ:
To unsubscribe, mail  Archives: