Browse thread
[Caml-list] Stop at exception
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Nicolas George <nicolas.george@e...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Non-mutable strings |
Le duodi 22 nivôse, an CCX, Brian Rogoff a écrit : > Sure, that works, but I think if the Caml community really wants immutable > strings (and it seems that quite a few people do) it might make sense to > try some alternative implementations, like ropes. It was mentioned on > this list that some older version of Caml used ropes; maybe they could be > resurrected? I second that. Something that would be really nice would be to have tail recursive appends as efficient as with the Buffer module. And from the syntactic viewpoint, a rule similar to the one that allow strings tokens to be seen as format could be the solution to implement that. ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr