[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | malc <malc@p...> |
| Subject: | [Caml-list] Is it really a non issue? |
I noticed that my bug report was silently moved to 'not a bug' section. Despite report's subject 'Not a bug, but...' i do think its atleast an issue. Consider this: file a.ml: let a = 1 file a.mli: val a : int \ val a : int | ........... | n times val a : int | val a : int / After compilation/linking we will get huge .cmi and binary with data section (n-1)*4(on 32bit architectures) bytes bigger that it should have been. Current ocamlopt.opt is 12 bytes bigger due to redundant declartions in bytecomp/lambda.mli(is_guarded,patch_guarded) and utils/clflags.ml(dump_scheduling), not a big deal but still anoying. -- mailto:malc@pulsesoft.com ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr