[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Ian Zimmerman <itz@s...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] p4 (newbie) question |
itz> shouldn't there be 2 distinct nodes like this
itz>
itz> <:expr< $e1$ . $e2$ >> : access in records
itz> <:expr< $me1$ . $e2$ >> : access in modules
Daniel> No: in these two quotations, e1, e2, me1, e2 are not some kind
Daniel> of "keywords" like you seem to believe, but variables. These
Daniel> quotations are (resp.) equivalent to:
Daniel> MLast.ExAcc (loc, e1, e2)
Daniel> MLast.ExAcc (loc, me1, e2)
Daniel> which cannot discriminate according to the cases
Daniel> record/modules as you see.
Well, I guess I can rephrase my question then: shouldn't there be both
MLast.ExRecAcc (loc, e1, e2) and
MLast.ExModAcc (loc, me1, e2)
?
After all, doesn't p4 have to pass distinct trees to the compiler
proper in these two cases?
Daniel> The difference is done by the first parameter when it
Daniel> represents (or not) an uppercase identifier:
Daniel> MLast.ExAcc (loc, MLast.ExUid loc s, e2)
Daniel> which can be written with quotations as:
Daniel> <:expr< $uid:s$ . $e2$ >>
Daniel> That is (above) the code of contructing a module access if s
Daniel> is a string holding the module name and e2 is an
Daniel> expression. If you already know the name of your module, and
Daniel> if it is e.g. Foo, you can write it:
Daniel> <:expr< Foo . $e2$ >>
But I don't know the name like that, it is not fixed; I am trying to
parse that as well. So my me1 can be any module access path in
general (OK, no functor applications for now, but arbitrary depth).
It would be a different story if the dot were right-associative; then,
indeed, I could write something like
let barexp = <:expr< Bar . $exp$ >> in
<:expr< Foo . $barexp$ >>
But this is ungrammatical; normal ocaml grammar says that
Foo.Bar.exp
is to be parsed as
(Foo.Bar).exp
Antoher question, and one I am afraid I know the answer to:
where/what is the quotation for applicative record update
{foo with bar = expr} ?
--
Ian Zimmerman, Oakland, California, U.S.A.
GPG: 433BA087 9C0F 194F 203A 63F7 B1B8 6E5A 8CA3 27DB 433B A087
In his own soul a man bears the source
from which he draws all his sorrows and his joys.
Sophocles.
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr