Browse thread
[Caml-list] Stop at exception
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | YAMAGATA yoriyuki <yoriyuki@m...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Non-mutable strings |
From: "Mattias Waldau" <mattias.waldau@abc.se> Subject: [Caml-list] Non-mutable strings Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 12:19:45 +0100 > If so, I wonder why not the standard strings of Ocaml are nonmutable? > It works fine for languages like Visual Basic, and Visual Basic has > great string performance compared to languages like C++. <self_advertisement> camomile (http://camomile.sourceforge.net) has an immutable string type for ISO-UCS. For fast concatenation, camomile provides Ubuffer module similar to Buffer module in standard libraries. Unlike Buffer.t, you can access individual characters in Ubuffer.t by a cursor. </self_advertisement> -- YAMAGATA, yoriyuki (doctoral student) Department of Mathematical Science, University of Tokyo. ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr