Browse thread
[Caml-list] Re: Syntax Changes in OCaml
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | dbmcclain <dbmcclain@e...> |
| Subject: | [Caml-list] Re: Syntax Changes in OCaml |
I had the distinct impression that the latest release of OCaml already imposes a (minor) syntax change in that tags on library function arguments are now mandatory. Is this not the case? My (mis?)understanding has already prevented my adoption of the latest version simply because of the effort required to port 20 KLOC of OCaml to this new imposition. If this is not the case, then I will gladly incorporate the newest version in my system. But this greater discussion has me wondering about whether you are talking of more egregious changes to the language syntax.... If so, it will certainly push me as a user to consider other alternatives. I don't wish to spend my time rewriting old code to keep up with a moving target language... - David McClain, Sr. Scientist, Raytheon Missile Systems Co., Tucson, AZ ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr