Hi,

On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 01:37:00PM -0000, Dave Berry wrote:

> Two ex-colleagues of mine published a paper in last year's OOPSLA about
> a macro system for Java.  In their paper they briefly mention Camlp4 in
> the "related work" section.  They say that because Camlp4 is
> grammar-based, it can't guarantee parseability.  Is this true, or did
> they not understand Camlp4 properly?

Yes, Camlp4 works with syntax trees, not with text.

-- 
Daniel de RAUGLAUDRE
daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr
http://cristal.inria.fr/~ddr/
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr