Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] otags problem
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Markus Mottl <markus@o...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] syntax change (was: camlp4o problem)
On Mon, 04 Feb 2002, Chris Hecker wrote:
> I think you rarely get a chance to change major things, and so you
> should take the opportunity before it's too late.  I would support such
> a change if the team wanted to do it.  I don't think they should do it
> lightly, obviously, but I also don't think they should be terrified of
> a change like this either.  Decide what's best for the future of caml,
> weighing user pain (but not overly strongly) and cleanliness benefit,
> and make a decision.

Considering the possibility that OCaml might become more mainstream,
I'd rather want to see this happen with a slightly cleaner syntax. It's
of course up to the OCaml-team to decide where they want to go...

Markus Mottl

Markus Mottl                                   
Austrian Research Institute
for Artificial Intelligence        
Bug reports:  FAQ:
To unsubscribe, mail  Archives: