>> the "related work" section.  They say that because Camlp4 is
>> grammar-based, it can't guarantee parseability.  Is this true, or did
>> they not understand Camlp4 properly?
>Yes, Camlp4 works with syntax trees, not with text.

What does that mean, "can't guarantee parseability?"

Chris


-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr