On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Alain Frisch wrote:

> What you describe seems to be overkill for the purpose. You could simply
> build a toplevel with a restricted standard library (without interaction
> with the OS and without unsafe operations like Obj), disabled directives,
> and use a wrapper to kill the toplevel when some timeout expires.
>
> What's wrong with this ?

Nothing's wrong with this in fact.
The only difference is that the user wouldn't know which values are really
unbound and which are simply discarded for security purposes.


Martin

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners