[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Ceri Storey <cez@p...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Allowing many types |
On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 08:43:20PM -0500, Ryan Tarpine wrote: > Is there a type that means "any polymorphic variant"? Trying to set > type primitive = [ `PTest ] > forces only `PTest to be the value of object_data. How can I allow > anything to be stored there? According to the output of the toplevel, then the type [> `Foo | `Bar ] should be usable, but alas, it is not allowable in type specifictions, giving "Unbound type parameter [..]". I've also tried just using plain tuples for this, but then lots of types become ungeneralisable, eg in the trivial example: # List.map (fun x -> x) [`X; `Y; `Z];; - : _[> `X | `Y | `Z] list = [`X; `Y; `Z] So say, declaring such a variable in a complied module is impossible (AFAIK). Thanks... -- Ceri Storey <cez@pkl.net> http://pkl.net/~cez/ vi(1)! postfix(7)! pie(5)! ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr