On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 01:55:24PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 12:11:39PM +0900, Jacques Garrigue wrote:
> > I know, GTK is far from ideal. But it's still the easiest thing to
> > interface with, after Tcl/Tk. Qt is so tightly bound to C++.
> 
> I'm interested in ohter opinions about this.
> A while ago I've looked for OCaml QT bindings but I find nothing, so I
> looked at it thinking to write them but seems to me that the real work
> is really really huge.
> Anyway I haven't looked at it enough deeper to see the ocaml related
> problems.
> 
> What are the intrinsic problems related to QT bindings coding?

As i understood it, the main problem is that it is more difficult to interface
with C++ than with C. I don't know the details, but that is the answer you
will get if reading the previous thread on this mailing list.

The second hindrance is naturally, as you said, it is really heavy work, and
there need to be someone working on it. I always thought some kind of semi
automatism would help a lot here though.

Friendly,

Sven Luther
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners