Browse thread
[Caml-list] Recursive classes and subtyping
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Claudio Sacerdoti Coen <sacerdot@c...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Recursive classes and subtyping |
> The reason for this overly conservative (in this case) assumption is > that the result of the type inference algorithm could otherwise depend > on the order in which the program is typed. It is dependent on that order. I have met such an example a few days ago. (If you want I can submit the code: it seemed strange, so I kept it.) Regards, C.S.C. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Real name: Claudio Sacerdoti Coen PhD Student in Computer Science at University of Bologna E-mail: sacerdot@cs.unibo.it http://caristudenti.cs.unibo.it/~sacerdot ---------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr