Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Recursive classes and subtyping
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Claudio Sacerdoti Coen <sacerdot@c...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Recursive classes and subtyping
> The reason for this overly conservative (in this case) assumption is
> that the result of the type inference algorithm could otherwise depend
> on the order in which the program is typed.

 It is dependent on that order. I have met such an example a few
 days ago. (If you want I can submit the code: it seemed strange, so
 I kept it.)


Real name: Claudio Sacerdoti Coen
PhD Student in Computer Science at University of Bologna
Bug reports:  FAQ:
To unsubscribe, mail  Archives: