Browse thread
[Caml-list] Odd Type Checking Problem
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Alain Frisch <frisch@c...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Odd Type Checking Problem |
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Jonathan D Eddy wrote: > (* type checks *) > let mAny = fun succ0 input -> succ0 in > let ans0 = true in > let x = mAny (mAny ans0) in > x 1 2 > > (* does not type check *) > let mAny: 'a -> int -> 'a = fun succ0 input -> succ0 in > let ans0 = true in > let x = mAny (mAny ans0) in > x 1 2 I guess this is a problem of understanding type variable scoping rules. The scope of the 'a variable above is all the phrase, including the (mAny (mAny ans0)). So the type annotation makes mAny monomorphic, but you want to use it with two different types. It seems that explicitly introduced type variables are generalized only at the (syntactic) level above their introduction; this together with unclear scoping rules may be confusing ... -- Alain ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr