Browse thread
[Caml-list] Odd Type Checking Problem
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Remi VANICAT <vanicat@l...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Odd Type Checking Problem |
stalkern2 <stalkern2@tin.it> writes: > Beginner's opinion: > I think that the compiler/interpreter is clear: > 'a->'b->'a > is not > 'a->'a->'b->'a > and that you just let the function starve before giving it the last > meatball. It's not the reason : in ocaml, you can do partial application (giving not all argument to a function). it steel strange because let mAny: 'a -> int -> 'a = fun succ0 input -> succ0;; let ans0 = true;; let x = mAny (mAny ans0);; x 1 2;; type checks... -- Rémi Vanicat vanicat@labri.u-bordeaux.fr http://dept-info.labri.u-bordeaux.fr/~vanicat ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr