On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 12:11:39PM +0900, Jacques Garrigue wrote:
> I know, GTK is far from ideal. But it's still the easiest thing to
> interface with, after Tcl/Tk. Qt is so tightly bound to C++.

I'm interested in ohter opinions about this.
A while ago I've looked for OCaml QT bindings but I find nothing, so I
looked at it thinking to write them but seems to me that the real work
is really really huge.
Anyway I haven't looked at it enough deeper to see the ocaml related
problems.

What are the intrinsic problems related to QT bindings coding?

TIA,
Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli - undergraduate student of CS @ Univ. Bologna, Italy
zack@cs.unibo.it | ICQ# 33538863 | http://www.cs.unibo.it/~zacchiro
"I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not
sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!" -- G.Romney
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners