Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] syntax foo
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: David Brown <caml-list@d...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] syntax foo
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 03:30:47PM +0000, Brian Rogoff wrote:

> Caml syntax is *not* why people like Caml. I'd go as far as to say that
> lots of people adopt it in spite of its flawed (though not awful, like
> Perl) syntax. To paraphrase American political soundbites, "It's the
> sematics, stupid!". (PS: No, I'm not calling you stupid.)

For myself, the Ocaml syntax is actually what won me over from SML.
Only later did I discover much of the other benefits of Ocaml.

Dave Brown
Bug reports:  FAQ:
To unsubscribe, mail  Archives: