Browse thread
[Caml-list] syntax foo
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | David Brown <caml-list@d...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] syntax foo |
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 03:30:47PM +0000, Brian Rogoff wrote: > Caml syntax is *not* why people like Caml. I'd go as far as to say that > lots of people adopt it in spite of its flawed (though not awful, like > Perl) syntax. To paraphrase American political soundbites, "It's the > sematics, stupid!". (PS: No, I'm not calling you stupid.) For myself, the Ocaml syntax is actually what won me over from SML. Only later did I discover much of the other benefits of Ocaml. Dave Brown ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr