Daniel de Rauglaudre a écrit :
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > Otherwise, even if the revised syntax (or an even better one) could be
> > considered superior, nobody will ever use it if it isn't the standard.
> 
> It has no chance to become the standard if nobody wants to use it...
> 
> There are very few users interested in the revised syntax. How much do
> you estimate the chances that people will accept a major change of the
> syntax?
> 
> You want my opinion? 0%
> 
> ..........
> 

I generally agree with that. But it there a tool to convert an OCaml
program
from one syntax to another ? I would not mind changing the syntax of 
my 20000 thousand lines program named PhoX, if there was a tool to do it
cleanly
(with good indentation, even for part of the code with very long phrase
hard to indent)


> --
> Daniel de RAUGLAUDRE
> daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr
> http://cristal.inria.fr/~ddr/
> -------------------
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
> To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr

-- 
Christophe Raffalli
Université de Savoie
Batiment Le Chablais, bureau 21
73376 Le Bourget-du-Lac Cedex

tél: (33) 4 79 75 81 03
fax: (33) 4 79 75 87 42
mail: Christophe.Raffalli@univ-savoie.fr
www: http://www.lama.univ-savoie.fr/~RAFFALLI
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr