> Any idea how much improvement would come from hash-consing, 
> as Dave Berry suggested? And only that part of a module's 
> signature which pertained to actual usage would need 
> inclusion, no? And only of those modules externally provided 
> upon which one's project depends, ie. the standard library, 
> not the internal project modules?

No idea.  It's certainly possible to reduce the size of the signature
information that has to be retained; how much and at what cost, I
don't know.

- Xavier Leroy
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners