[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | tim@f... |
| Subject: | Sample code (was Re: [Caml-list] The DLL-hell of O'Caml) |
From: "Dave Berry" <Dave@kal.com> >You can drop a version of our >utilities DLL compiled last night into a distribution from two years >ago, and your distribution will carry on working as if nothing had >changed. So it is possible, even on Microsoft systems, given sufficient >care on the part of the designers. > >What would be nice would be a type system that could ensure this for us. >There's some opportunities for academic research here, surely? I proposed a scheme for ensuring type-safety in this situation on this mailing list yesterday morning, along with a concrete example. No replies yet. The message is in the archives at: http://caml.inria.fr/archives/200203/msg00158.html If you don't want to unpack the sample code from the email, you may download it from http://www.fungible.com/dll-example.tar.gz This file is only 1418 bytes. -- Tim Freeman tim@fungible.com ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners