Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] The DLL-hell of O'Caml
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Alain Frisch <frisch@c...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] The DLL-hell of O'Caml |
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Gerd Stolpmann wrote: > Oh, sorry, I was here on the wrong track. Adding a function does not > break functor applications. Is there any case where module signatures > must exactly match? I'm not sure this answer the question, but for instance, if you have: a.ml empty b.ml: let f x = x +. 1. include A b.mli: val f: float -> float then you are not allowed to add: let f x = x + 1 to a.ml -- Alain ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners