Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] The DLL-hell of O'Caml
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Markus Mottl <markus@o...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] The DLL-hell of O'Caml |
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Xavier Leroy wrote: > All we need for OCaml libraries is source distribution, a standardized > re-building procedure, Yes, please! > I believe this is a much more reasonable objective than dreaming > about binary compatibility and whatnot. Still, it's not trivial: > the authors of existing OCaml libraries (myself included) have some > work to do to implement fully automatic build of their libraries... Good to know that the INRIA-team is not neglecting this burning issue and thinking about solutions. I really hope that OCaml libraries get the reverse transcriptase they need to become really virulent for spreading to all machines on this planet :-) Regards, Markus Mottl -- Markus Mottl markus@oefai.at Austrian Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence http://www.oefai.at/~markus ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners