Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Ocaml efficiency
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Vitaly Lugovsky <vsl@o...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Ocaml efficiency
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, [iso-8859-1] Jérôme Marant wrote:

> Hi,
>   Some people are sometimes writing or thinking about writing
>   applications in OCaml without knowing it OCaml is suitable
>   for the kind of applications they're writing.
>   So my question is for what kind of applications isn't OCaml
>   suitable for and better written in a lower lever language?
>   What is the real cost (in CPU) of interfaces to C libraries
>   since some processing have to be performed in order to convert
>   lower level types to Caml types?

 I think, that there is no formal answer to your question.
Use profiler to find out the bottleneck...

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: