[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Vitaly Lugovsky <vsl@o...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Ocaml efficiency |
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, [iso-8859-1] Jérôme Marant wrote: > > Hi, > > Some people are sometimes writing or thinking about writing > applications in OCaml without knowing it OCaml is suitable > for the kind of applications they're writing. > > So my question is for what kind of applications isn't OCaml > suitable for and better written in a lower lever language? > > What is the real cost (in CPU) of interfaces to C libraries > since some processing have to be performed in order to convert > lower level types to Caml types? I think, that there is no formal answer to your question. Use profiler to find out the bottleneck... ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners