Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Ocaml efficiency
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: jmarant@n...
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Ocaml efficiency
Xavier Leroy <> writes:

> One example is software components that take a low-level view of the
> memory (as an untyped collection of bytes or words accessed via
> addresses): memory managers, garbage collectors, device drivers, and
> to some extent virtual machine interpreters.


> Caml/C conversions on other data types can be more expensive, though.
> Still, as long as the C function does some real work (e.g. 1000 cycles
> of computation), the overhead of calling it from Caml should be
> negligible.

  Many thanks for all those accurate explainations.


Jérôme Marant
To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: