On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 05:22:16AM -0700, Tim Freeman wrote:
> 
> Will Benton allegedly wrote:
> >  2.  O'Caml bindings are already available for OpenGL.
> 
> From: John Max Skaller <skaller@ozemail.com.au>
> >In that case, why are we sticking with Tk?
> 
> I don't get it.  Tk is about 2D graphics, and OpenGL is about
> accelerated 3d graphics.  Your question presupposes that we have a
> choice between one and the other, but I can't think of any
> applications for which that is true.

Well, there is nothing stopping you from using OpenGL to do 2D. For instance,
SGI used OpenGL to code a word processor back then, but then, they were SGI.

Friendly,

Sven Luther
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners