On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>   Well, this would make a static printf rather that the well known printf
>   from C, since the format string may be known only at runtime in some
>   cases.

Sure, but the current solution isn't very convenient in this respect
anyway. It's usually easiest to pass higher-order functions that handle
specific parts in a pattern (%t or %a) at runtime.

Regards,
Markus Mottl

-- 
Markus Mottl                                             markus@oefai.at
Austrian Research Institute
for Artificial Intelligence                  http://www.oefai.at/~markus
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners