Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Ocaml efficiency
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Vitaly Lugovsky <vsl@o...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Ocaml efficiency
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Xavier Leroy wrote:

> In both cases, OCaml will not only give you lower performance than
> say C, Fortran or assembly, but the OCaml code will not be
> cleaner nor easier to write than the C or Fortran code.

 Btw., many of the numerical algorithms can be very well explained
in Caml when Fortran code is not readable at all.

 So, it's good for number crunching even when its efficiency
is much more poor then Fortran or C.

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: