On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 10:24:57AM -0400, Christian Lindig wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 04:01:33PM +0200, Warp wrote:
> 
> > In my last post, I was talking about finding the good order for
> > CMO-linking when you only got ocamldep output.  I've think about it,
> > and here's some results, please let me know if there is another/better
> > way.
> 
> I once proposed a sorted output for ocamldep that could be used as the
> linking order. The output would be sorted such that files that come
> early in the link order also come early in the output. A simple sed
> script then could strip away dependencies to get just the file names for
> linking.  I still like the idea but my patch for ocamldep that
> implemented the topological ordering did not make it into the
> distribution.

Maybe just use tsort(1) ? (if you want sed anyway).

-- 
: Michal Moskal :::::::: malekith/at/pld.org.pl :  GCS {C,UL}++++$ a? !tv
: PLD Linux ::::::: Wroclaw University, CS Dept :  {E-,w}-- {b++,e}>+++ h
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners