Thanks, I looked into it.  It looks powerful, yet risky 
(being in "its infancy") and intimidating compared to 
the simple mechanism for overloading operators in C++.
It would be nice to see something more straightforward.

Issac


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gurr, David (MED, self) [mailto:David.Gurr@med.ge.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 7:33 PM
> To: Issac Trotts; caml-list@inria.fr
> Subject: RE: [Caml-list] operator overloading
> 
> 
> 
> Try a google search for FOC and ocaml and see if that is not
> a better solution to matrices, etc than overloading. -D
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Issac Trotts [mailto:ITrotts@IdolMinds.com]
> > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 12:08 PM
> > To: caml-list@inria.fr
> > Subject: [Caml-list] operator overloading
> > 
> > 
> > Looking at the Google results, operator overloading has come up 
> > as a frequently discuseed topic.  Still I didn't find anything 
> > very useful in the posts that Google brought up.  Can anyone 
> > recommend a way to work around OCaml's lack of operator overloading
> > when dealing with matrices, vectors, and spinors?  Is there a 
> > way to implement this with ocamlp4?
> > 
> > Issac Trotts 
> > Programmer
> > Idol Minds
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -------------------
> > To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: 
> http://caml.inria.fr
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ:
> http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> -------------------
> To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: 
http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ:
http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners



-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners