Browse thread
[Caml-list] Ocaml efficiency
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | jmarant@f... |
| Subject: | [Caml-list] Ocaml efficiency |
Hi,
Some people are sometimes writing or thinking about writing
applications in OCaml without knowing it OCaml is suitable
for the kind of applications they're writing.
So my question is for what kind of applications isn't OCaml
suitable for and better written in a lower lever language?
What is the real cost (in CPU) of interfaces to C libraries
since some processing have to be performed in order to convert
lower level types to Caml types?
Thanks.
Regards,
--
Jérôme Marant
http://marant.org
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners