First of all, many thanks to all who replied -- I really enjoy being
on this list!

On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Xavier Leroy <xavier.leroy@inria.fr> wrote:
> 
> Maybe not.  Actually, using Map isn't such a bad idea in this
> program, because maps are already sorted.

Yes, but can we rely on that since the documentation says:

	The order in which the associated values are passed
	is unspecified.

Does it mean it can change any time in the future or is the library
basically going to stay that way?

Best regards,
ChriS
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners