Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] Applications written in O'Caml
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | james woodyatt <jhw@w...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Simple question |
On Friday, April 12, 2002, at 12:15 PM, Eric Merritt wrote: > > by this I assume that the '@' function is not as > strait forward as I thought it would be? In what > manner does it append to the list to make the time > 0(n^2)? -just curious. Here's the definition of the '@' operator from $OCAMLLIB/pervasives.ml: > let rec (@) l1 l2 = > match l1 with > [] -> l2 > | hd :: tl -> hd :: (tl @ l2) -- j h woodyatt <jhw@wetware.com> ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners