[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Christian Lindig <lindig@e...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Modules Order |
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 04:01:33PM +0200, Warp wrote: > In my last post, I was talking about finding the good order for > CMO-linking when you only got ocamldep output. I've think about it, > and here's some results, please let me know if there is another/better > way. I once proposed a sorted output for ocamldep that could be used as the linking order. The output would be sorted such that files that come early in the link order also come early in the output. A simple sed script then could strip away dependencies to get just the file names for linking. I still like the idea but my patch for ocamldep that implemented the topological ordering did not make it into the distribution. -- Christian ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners