> > It's really hard to define "better"... Beauty is in the eye of the
> > beholder...
>
> Sure.
>
> However, OpenGL has two major advantages over Direct3D even if you
> don't consider how easy it is to use or how efficient it is:
>   1.  It is not controlled by a single company (especially not a
>       convicted predatory monopolist).  A sub-point of this is that
>       many implementations are available for many different platforms.
>   2.  O'Caml bindings are already available for OpenGL.

For the 1st point , I do agree, but actually Microsoft is really well
supporting DirectX , and sometimes it's better to have only one company
behind a product, because you don't have to care about driver compatibility
and all MCD/ICD/etc.... stuff of OpenGL which isn't very nice :)

For the 2nd point, I didn't want such a low-level interface.

Nicolas Cannasse



-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners