Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] CamlIDL and true abstract types
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Lauri Alanko <la@i...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] CamlIDL and true abstract types
On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 11:03:17AM +0400, Dmitry Bely wrote:
> Read the manual more carefully :-)
> typedef [abstract] void* Foo;

Yes, I read about that, but I consider it a hack, not proper support.
Since CamlIDL considers Foo completely opaque and doesn't even see that
it is a pointer, I cannot use pointer-specific attributes such as [ref],
[unique] and [ignore]. And saying that a type is void* when it really is
Foo* isn't even strictly legal, the way the stubs are implemented:
though conversion between void* and T* is legal for all object types T,
conversion between void** and T** isn't, yet this is the sort of type
punning that the generated stub code does.

Lauri Alanko
To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: