I've fixed the broken links to postscript and PDF versions of the
results of benchmarking "Functional Unparsing" style output functions
against the equivalent O'Caml and C printf functions.

I apologize for the inconvenience, and thank those who pointed out the
problem.

Earlier today I wrote:
> I've updated the software slightly and included the results and a
> short explanation (in postscript and PDF) on that page of some
> benchmarking I did that shows that the Cpsio functions are faster than
> the equivalent OCaml printf functions in byte-code, and often faster
> in native-code, despite doing more garbage collecting.  Results are
> also compared to the equivalent C printf functions.
> 
> The web page again is:
> 
>     http://tkb.mpl.com/~tkb/software.html
-- 
T. Kurt Bond, tkb@tkb.mpl.com

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners