English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Curious about Unix.readdir and ls
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Jens Olsson <jenso@o...>
Subject: [Caml-list] Curious about Unix.readdir and ls

I was wondering.... when doing Unix.readdir on an Emacs backup file (like #myfile#), I only get the name #myfile (without ending #). First I thought that was a problem related to the readdir function but obviously it is a little deeper than that:

When doing 'ls .' on the directory containing the above example file ls seems to have the same problem (at least on my system). The file is printed in flashing red and without the ending #. Or is this as it should? How do I know that? 

BUT, if I let the shell expand a wildcard, it does so correctly: 'ls *' returns a line containing #myfile# and my ocaml program doing readdir gets a correct filename (of course).

So, what is happening? Anyone who wants to enlighten me? :)

Jens Olsson
Download the free Opera browser at http://www.opera.com/

Powered by Outblaze
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners