Browse thread
[Caml-list] Generating C stubs
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2002-05-21 (17:10) |
From: | james woodyatt <jhw@w...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Camlp4/OCaml [was: Generating C stubs] |
On Sunday, May 19, 2002, at 04:31 AM, Markus Mottl wrote: > [...] > What I consider at least as important is how to introduce syntactic > changes into a language without driving users mad. This gets us back > to the topic of having camlp4 in the distribution or not. I think that > irrespective of the syntactic rules the community can finally agree on, > a tool like camlp4 would be very welcome to support a transition. I'd like to go on record as agreeing with what Markus wrote about syntax issues in Ocaml in the message excerpted above. In addition, the paragraph I chose to quote represents an opinion that I, too, hold quite strongly. -- j h woodyatt <jhw@wetware.com> "The plainest print cannot be read through a solid gold sovereign, or a ruble, or a golden eagle." --sam cummings, famous arms dealer ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners