Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Suggestion about balanced trees in stdlib
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@c...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Suggestion about balanced trees in stdlib
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 04:05:58PM -0700, Alexander V.Voinov wrote:
> > I don't know how the compiler treat unit values wrt optimization or
> > such, but using an unit in each node to emulate Set seems to me
> > inefficient for a module of the standard library.
> Is 1 (integer one) better? :-)

No, is the same, they are both unboxed integers.


Stefano Zacchiroli - undergraduate student of CS @ Univ. Bologna, Italy | ICQ# 33538863 |
"I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not
sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!" -- G.Romney
To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: