Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Timing Ocaml
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Lionel Fourquaux <lionel.fourquaux@w...>
Subject: RE: [Caml-list] Timing Ocaml
> From: [mailto:owner-caml-
>] On Behalf Of Dmitry Bely
> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 6:30 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Timing Ocaml
> Thank a lot for the explanation. But why then not to use inline asm
> MSVC, something like that:

	Because any fragment of inline asm disable a lot of
optimisations in MSVC, and you end up with a much slower interpreter.

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: