English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Timing Ocaml
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2002-06-10 (16:49)
From: Lionel Fourquaux <lionel.fourquaux@w...>
Subject: RE: [Caml-list] Timing Ocaml
> From: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr [mailto:owner-caml-
> list@pauillac.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Dmitry Bely
> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 6:30 PM
> To: caml-list@inria.fr
> Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Timing Ocaml
> Thank a lot for the explanation. But why then not to use inline asm
> MSVC, something like that:

	Because any fragment of inline asm disable a lot of
optimisations in MSVC, and you end up with a much slower interpreter.

To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners