Browse thread
[Caml-list] Timing Ocaml
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2002-06-10 (16:49) |
From: | Lionel Fourquaux <lionel.fourquaux@w...> |
Subject: | RE: [Caml-list] Timing Ocaml |
> From: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr [mailto:owner-caml- > list@pauillac.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Dmitry Bely > Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 6:30 PM > To: caml-list@inria.fr > Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Timing Ocaml > > Thank a lot for the explanation. But why then not to use inline asm for > MSVC, something like that: Because any fragment of inline asm disable a lot of optimisations in MSVC, and you end up with a much slower interpreter. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners